2 of 2 spots open

Apply for a founding spot

What an AHPRA advertising breach actually costs

Updated 5 min readSourced to Ahpra

The short answer

The maximum penalty for an advertising offence under the National Law is $60,000 per offence for an individual and $120,000 per offence for a body corporate. Those figures replaced $5,000 and $10,000 in 2022 and have applied in every Australian jurisdiction, including Western Australia, since July 2024.

On this page

If you have read that an AHPRA advertising breach costs $5,000, you have read something written before 2022 — or something that copied something written before 2022. The figure is now twelve times higher.

The numbers

OffenceIndividualBody corporate
Advertising offence — before the 2022 amendment$5,000$10,000
Advertising offence — current$60,000$120,000
Unlawful use of a protected title$60,000, up to 3 years imprisonment, or both$120,000
Maximum penalties per offence under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. Source: Ahpra.

Two details in that table are worth pulling out.

  • Per offence. Not per website, not per complaint. A page carrying three distinct prohibited claims is not obviously one offence.
  • Body corporate. Most Australian dental practices are incorporated, which means the $120,000 figure, not the $60,000 one, is the relevant ceiling for the practice — and a registered practitioner can be exposed personally on top of that.

When the change happened

The National Law was amended in 2022. The increase applied progressively as each state and territory adopted it, and Ahpra records that as of July 2024 the increased penalties apply in all jurisdictions, including Western Australia.

Ahpra also notes that the advertising guidelines document itself will be updated to reflect the change when the guidelines are next reviewed. That is the reason the old numbers persist: a practitioner reading the current guidelines PDF may still see the superseded figures in the body text, while the penalty page states the new ones.

What actually happens when someone complains

The maximum penalty is the ceiling of a court proceeding, and a court proceeding is not the usual first move. In practice the sequence looks more like this:

  1. A complaint is made

    Anyone can make one — a member of the public, a patient, or, most often in dentistry, a competing practice down the road who has noticed your “#1 dentist in the shire” banner.

  2. Ahpra assesses it

    Ahpra assesses advertising complaints against the National Law and its published compliance and enforcement strategy, which sets out how it prioritises the matters it pursues.

  3. You are usually asked to fix it

    For most first-instance breaches the practical outcome is a request to correct the advertising within a set period, and confirmation that you have done so.

  4. Escalation if it is not fixed, or is serious

    Continued or serious non-compliance can lead to prosecution. Separately, a National Board may decide the breach raises a concern about the practitioner’s conduct.

  5. The registration consequence

    This is the part practitioners underestimate. A Board can take action including placing conditions on a practitioner’s registration — a professional consequence that outlasts any fine, and which appears on the public register.

Who pays it

The advertiser. Ahpra defines that as whoever controls the advertising: someone who publishes or authorises content, or directs someone else to publish or draft it — including a third party, a staff member or a marketing agency — or who has a mechanism to modify or remove content published by an unrelated publisher.

Depending on the structure of a practice, the principal practitioner, practice owner or director may be responsible for the practice’s advertising. Ahpra states plainly that advertisers are responsible for their advertising and need to check content produced by others on their behalf.

In other words: the agency that wrote “painless dentistry” across your homepage is not the one Ahpra will be writing to. Ask any agency you engage what specifically they do to prevent it — and treat “we know the guidelines” as a non-answer.

Has anyone actually been fined?
Ahpra publishes advertising cases heard by courts and tribunals, and prosecutes where it considers it warranted. But the far more common outcome for a typical practice website breach is a direction to correct the advertising — which is precisely why the risk gets discounted until it is someone you know.
Does my professional indemnity insurance cover this?
Policies differ and many do provide assistance with regulatory matters, but this is a question for your insurer rather than for us. A fine imposed as a penalty is commonly excluded from cover even where the cost of responding is not.
Is a body corporate really exposed to $120,000?
That is the maximum per offence for a body corporate under the National Law. Maximums are ceilings, not expected outcomes — but they are the figure the legislature chose after deciding $10,000 was not deterring anyone.
What if I inherited the website from the previous owner?
Responsibility attaches to control of the advertising now, not to who wrote it. If you can change the page, it is your advertising. A practice acquisition is one of the best moments to run a full advertising audit.

Sources

  1. Advertising and the lawAhpra
  2. Guidelines for advertising a regulated health serviceAhpra & the National Boards
  3. How we manage advertising complaintsAhpra
  4. Advertising compliance and enforcement strategyAhpra