2 of 2 spots open

Apply for a founding spot

The words you can’t use on an Australian dental website

Updated 8 min readSourced to Ahpra

The short answer

Superlatives (“best dentist”, “#1”), outcome promises (“guaranteed”, “painless”, “perfect smile”), testimonial framing (“patients say”, “highly recommend”), urgency (“act now”, “limited time”), the protected title “specialist”, and prescription-medicine brand names all carry real risk on an Australian dental website. Below is the complete 35-phrase list, with compliant alternatives.

On this page

Most guidance on Australian dental advertising stops at “avoid superlatives and don’t make claims you can’t back up”, which is true and completely unactionable at 11pm when you are writing your own veneers page.

So here is the actual list. These 35 phrases are the rule set our build pipeline runs against every dental website we ship — if one of them appears in a client’s copy, the site does not deploy. We have published it in full, with the reason and a compliant alternative for each, because a specific list is worth more to you than another article telling you to be careful.

The list

Superlatives & rankings

Why it is a risk: A claim to be the best, the leading or the number one practice is a comparison, and a comparison has to be supported by acceptable evidence. There is no accepted evidence base that ranks dental practices, so the claim cannot be substantiated.

PhraseThe problemTry instead
best dentistSuperlative claim, AHPRA doesn’t allow ranking yourself above other practitioners.experienced, caring team
best inSuperlative claim, comparative rankings can’t be substantiated.a great choice in
number oneSuperlative ranking claim.trusted by local families
#1Superlative ranking claim.trusted by local families
no. 1Superlative ranking claim.trusted by local families
leading dentalComparative superiority claim.established local practice
world-classSuperlative claim that can’t be substantiated.modern, high-quality care
cheapestPrice superlative.affordable, transparent pricing
lowest pricesPrice superlative.clear, upfront pricing
Relevant provision: s133(1)(a) — false, misleading or deceptive

Outcome promises

Why it is a risk: Dental outcomes vary between patients. Language that promises a specific result — guaranteed, painless, permanent, a perfect smile — sets an expectation the treatment cannot reliably meet.

PhraseThe problemTry instead
guaranteedOutcome guarantee, dental outcomes vary between patients.we’ll talk you through what to expect
guarantee resultsOutcome guarantee, dental outcomes vary between patients.we’ll explain likely outcomes honestly
painlessImplied outcome guarantee. You can’t promise a patient feels nothing.gentle, comfort-focused
pain-freeImplied outcome guarantee. You can’t promise a patient feels nothing.gentle, comfort-focused
pain freeImplied outcome guarantee. You can’t promise a patient feels nothing.gentle, comfort-focused
no painImplied outcome guarantee.we prioritise your comfort
risk-freeImplied no-risk claim. Every procedure carries some risk.we’ll explain any risks clearly
cureClinical-outcome claim.help manage
amazing resultsOutcome claim, creates an unreasonable expectation of benefit.results tailored to you
perfect smileOutcome guarantee, describes the result, not the treatment.a smile you feel good about
life-changingExaggerated outcome claim.a positive difference
miracleExaggerated claim.effective, evidence-based care
permanent resultsOutcome guarantee, permanence can’t be promised.long-lasting with the right care
Relevant provision: s133(1)(d) — creates an unreasonable expectation of beneficial treatment

Testimonial framing

Why it is a risk: A recommendation or positive statement about the clinical aspects of care cannot appear in advertising. Phrasing that reports what patients say about their treatment is a testimonial even when no patient is quoted by name.

PhraseThe problemTry instead
changed my lifeTestimonial about a clinical outcome. Never allowed in health advertising.what to expect from this treatment
patients sayReads as a testimonial. Patient views on clinical care can’t be used in advertising.our approach is
patients loveReads as a testimonial about clinical care.our approach is
highly recommendTestimonial framing, a recommendation about care can’t appear in your advertising.learn what the treatment involves
Relevant provision: s133(1)(c) — uses testimonials or purported testimonials

Urgency & manufactured scarcity

Why it is a risk: Ahpra names this pattern directly: phrases such as “don’t delay”, “act now before it’s too late”, “don’t miss out”, “time is running out” or “for a limited time only” create urgency, and may be unlawful where they are linked to unsubstantiated claims that a person’s health may suffer if they do not act.

PhraseThe problemTry instead
limited timeCreates urgency around clinical treatment, AHPRA discourages time pressure.available year-round
act nowCreates urgency around clinical treatment.book when it suits you
offer endsCreates urgency around clinical treatment.talk to us about costs
spots leftManufactured scarcity around clinical treatment.call us to find a time
Relevant provision: s133(1)(e) — encourages indiscriminate or unnecessary use of health services

Protected titles

Why it is a risk: “Specialist” and the recognised dental specialties are protected titles. A general dentist with a genuine interest in orthodontics cannot describe themselves as specialising in it — that is a separate offence from misleading advertising, and it carries the same maximum penalty.

PhraseThe problemTry instead
specialistProtected title, only use it if the practitioner holds AHPRA specialist registration in that specialty.experienced in
specialises inImplies specialist registration. A general dentist can’t "specialise".with a special interest in
specializes inImplies specialist registration. A general dentist can’t "specialise".with a special interest in
specialising inImplies specialist registration. A general dentist can’t "specialise".with a special interest in
Relevant provision: s113–s119 protected titles, and s133(1)(a)

Prescription-medicine brand names

Why it is a risk: Naming a Schedule 4 (prescription-only) substance by its brand name in advertising directed at the public is prohibited under therapeutic-goods law, separately from anything in the National Law.

PhraseThe problemTry instead
botoxNames a prescription-only (Schedule 4) substance by brand, cannot be advertised to the public.anti-wrinkle injections
Relevant provision: Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 — advertising of prescription-only medicines

The phrases Ahpra names itself

Worth separating out, because these are not our interpretation. Ahpra’s summary of the advertising requirements names these urgency phrases directly as language that creates a sense of urgency and may be unlawful where it is linked to unsubstantiated claims that a person’s health may suffer if they do not use the service:

  • “don’t delay”
  • “act now before it’s too late”
  • “don’t miss out”
  • “time is running out”
  • “for a limited time only”

If your practice runs seasonal promotions, this is the paragraph to read twice. The problem is not the discount — it is pairing a discount with time pressure on a clinical decision.

Three phrases that deserve more explanation

“Specialist” and “specialising in”

This is the one that surprises people, because the everyday meaning of the word is so different from its legal meaning. Specialist titles are protected under the National Law. A general dentist who does a great deal of orthodontics, has done additional training in it, and is genuinely good at it still cannot advertise as “specialising in orthodontics” unless they hold specialist registration in that field.

The safe construction is “with a special interest in”, which is accurate and does not imply registration you do not hold. Unlawful use of a protected title is its own offence, carrying up to $60,000 per offence for an individual, up to three years imprisonment, or both.

“Painless” and “pain-free”

A promise about what a patient will feel is an outcome claim, and pain is subjective and variable. It also runs into the risk-disclosure requirement from the opposite direction: advertising should give accurate information about the risks or potential risks of a treatment, and “painless” asserts the absence of one.

What you almost certainly mean is that your practice is set up for anxious patients — longer appointments, topical anaesthetic before the needle, a stop signal, sedation options. Say that instead. It is more specific, it is verifiable, and it is far more reassuring to the person who is actually frightened.

Naming an anti-wrinkle product

Nothing to do with the National Law — this one is therapeutic-goods law. Prescription-only (Schedule 4) substances cannot be advertised to the public by brand name. Practices offering facial injectables must describe the treatment generically. It is also why you will see clinics write “anti-wrinkle injections” and coyly avoid the noun; that is not squeamishness, it is the law.

What to write instead

Every phrase above is a superlative, a promise or a piece of pressure. The replacement is nearly always the same move: swap the claim for a fact the patient can check.

Instead of a claimUse a checkable fact
“The best dentist in Brunswick”“Treating families in Brunswick since 2009”
“Painless dentistry”“Longer appointments, topical numbing before every injection, and a stop signal you control”
“Perfect smile guaranteed”“We’ll show you a digital preview before we start, and talk through what is and isn’t achievable”
“Our patients love us”“4.8 from 213 Google reviews” (linked to the profile)
“Limited-time whitening offer”“Whitening is $X, all-inclusive, available year-round”
“Specialising in implants”“Dr Chen has a special interest in implant dentistry and has placed over 400”

The second column is harder to write and does more work. Superlatives are what you reach for when you have not decided what is actually true about your practice.

Is this list official?
No. Ahpra does not publish a banned-word list, and it is important not to imply otherwise — the National Law prohibits categories of claim, not specific words. This is our working list, built from the categories in the Guidelines for advertising a regulated health service and the examples in Ahpra’s summary of the requirements, and used as a build gate on the sites we ship.
What if the phrase appears in a patient’s own words?
That does not help you. If it is in your advertising, it is your advertising. A review that says “painless” republished on your website is both an outcome claim and, if it refers to treatment, a testimonial.
Can I say “affordable”?
“Affordable” on its own is a vague claim rather than a superlative, and is generally lower-risk than “cheapest” or “lowest prices”. But if you publish prices alongside it, they must be clear, accurate and include the total price, not just an entry-level figure.
Does this list cover everything?
No, and no list could. It catches the recurring, mechanical failures. It cannot catch a page that promises an outcome in fresh language, or a price that quietly excludes the crown. Read the guidelines in full and use Ahpra’s self-assessment tool as well.

Sources

  1. Summary of the advertising requirementsAhpra
  2. Guidelines for advertising a regulated health serviceAhpra & the National Boards
  3. Titles in health advertisingAhpra
  4. Advertising and the lawAhpra