The words you can’t use on an Australian dental website
Updated 8 min readSourced to Ahpra
The short answer
Superlatives (“best dentist”, “#1”), outcome promises (“guaranteed”, “painless”, “perfect smile”), testimonial framing (“patients say”, “highly recommend”), urgency (“act now”, “limited time”), the protected title “specialist”, and prescription-medicine brand names all carry real risk on an Australian dental website. Below is the complete 35-phrase list, with compliant alternatives.
On this page
Most guidance on Australian dental advertising stops at “avoid superlatives and don’t make claims you can’t back up”, which is true and completely unactionable at 11pm when you are writing your own veneers page.
So here is the actual list. These 35 phrases are the rule set our build pipeline runs against every dental website we ship — if one of them appears in a client’s copy, the site does not deploy. We have published it in full, with the reason and a compliant alternative for each, because a specific list is worth more to you than another article telling you to be careful.
The list
Superlatives & rankings
Why it is a risk: A claim to be the best, the leading or the number one practice is a comparison, and a comparison has to be supported by acceptable evidence. There is no accepted evidence base that ranks dental practices, so the claim cannot be substantiated.
| Phrase | The problem | Try instead |
|---|---|---|
| best dentist | Superlative claim, AHPRA doesn’t allow ranking yourself above other practitioners. | experienced, caring team |
| best in | Superlative claim, comparative rankings can’t be substantiated. | a great choice in |
| number one | Superlative ranking claim. | trusted by local families |
| #1 | Superlative ranking claim. | trusted by local families |
| no. 1 | Superlative ranking claim. | trusted by local families |
| leading dental | Comparative superiority claim. | established local practice |
| world-class | Superlative claim that can’t be substantiated. | modern, high-quality care |
| cheapest | Price superlative. | affordable, transparent pricing |
| lowest prices | Price superlative. | clear, upfront pricing |
Outcome promises
Why it is a risk: Dental outcomes vary between patients. Language that promises a specific result — guaranteed, painless, permanent, a perfect smile — sets an expectation the treatment cannot reliably meet.
| Phrase | The problem | Try instead |
|---|---|---|
| guaranteed | Outcome guarantee, dental outcomes vary between patients. | we’ll talk you through what to expect |
| guarantee results | Outcome guarantee, dental outcomes vary between patients. | we’ll explain likely outcomes honestly |
| painless | Implied outcome guarantee. You can’t promise a patient feels nothing. | gentle, comfort-focused |
| pain-free | Implied outcome guarantee. You can’t promise a patient feels nothing. | gentle, comfort-focused |
| pain free | Implied outcome guarantee. You can’t promise a patient feels nothing. | gentle, comfort-focused |
| no pain | Implied outcome guarantee. | we prioritise your comfort |
| risk-free | Implied no-risk claim. Every procedure carries some risk. | we’ll explain any risks clearly |
| cure | Clinical-outcome claim. | help manage |
| amazing results | Outcome claim, creates an unreasonable expectation of benefit. | results tailored to you |
| perfect smile | Outcome guarantee, describes the result, not the treatment. | a smile you feel good about |
| life-changing | Exaggerated outcome claim. | a positive difference |
| miracle | Exaggerated claim. | effective, evidence-based care |
| permanent results | Outcome guarantee, permanence can’t be promised. | long-lasting with the right care |
Testimonial framing
Why it is a risk: A recommendation or positive statement about the clinical aspects of care cannot appear in advertising. Phrasing that reports what patients say about their treatment is a testimonial even when no patient is quoted by name.
| Phrase | The problem | Try instead |
|---|---|---|
| changed my life | Testimonial about a clinical outcome. Never allowed in health advertising. | what to expect from this treatment |
| patients say | Reads as a testimonial. Patient views on clinical care can’t be used in advertising. | our approach is |
| patients love | Reads as a testimonial about clinical care. | our approach is |
| highly recommend | Testimonial framing, a recommendation about care can’t appear in your advertising. | learn what the treatment involves |
Urgency & manufactured scarcity
Why it is a risk: Ahpra names this pattern directly: phrases such as “don’t delay”, “act now before it’s too late”, “don’t miss out”, “time is running out” or “for a limited time only” create urgency, and may be unlawful where they are linked to unsubstantiated claims that a person’s health may suffer if they do not act.
| Phrase | The problem | Try instead |
|---|---|---|
| limited time | Creates urgency around clinical treatment, AHPRA discourages time pressure. | available year-round |
| act now | Creates urgency around clinical treatment. | book when it suits you |
| offer ends | Creates urgency around clinical treatment. | talk to us about costs |
| spots left | Manufactured scarcity around clinical treatment. | call us to find a time |
Protected titles
Why it is a risk: “Specialist” and the recognised dental specialties are protected titles. A general dentist with a genuine interest in orthodontics cannot describe themselves as specialising in it — that is a separate offence from misleading advertising, and it carries the same maximum penalty.
| Phrase | The problem | Try instead |
|---|---|---|
| specialist | Protected title, only use it if the practitioner holds AHPRA specialist registration in that specialty. | experienced in |
| specialises in | Implies specialist registration. A general dentist can’t "specialise". | with a special interest in |
| specializes in | Implies specialist registration. A general dentist can’t "specialise". | with a special interest in |
| specialising in | Implies specialist registration. A general dentist can’t "specialise". | with a special interest in |
Prescription-medicine brand names
Why it is a risk: Naming a Schedule 4 (prescription-only) substance by its brand name in advertising directed at the public is prohibited under therapeutic-goods law, separately from anything in the National Law.
| Phrase | The problem | Try instead |
|---|---|---|
| botox | Names a prescription-only (Schedule 4) substance by brand, cannot be advertised to the public. | anti-wrinkle injections |
The phrases Ahpra names itself
Worth separating out, because these are not our interpretation. Ahpra’s summary of the advertising requirements names these urgency phrases directly as language that creates a sense of urgency and may be unlawful where it is linked to unsubstantiated claims that a person’s health may suffer if they do not use the service:
- “don’t delay”
- “act now before it’s too late”
- “don’t miss out”
- “time is running out”
- “for a limited time only”
If your practice runs seasonal promotions, this is the paragraph to read twice. The problem is not the discount — it is pairing a discount with time pressure on a clinical decision.
Three phrases that deserve more explanation
“Specialist” and “specialising in”
This is the one that surprises people, because the everyday meaning of the word is so different from its legal meaning. Specialist titles are protected under the National Law. A general dentist who does a great deal of orthodontics, has done additional training in it, and is genuinely good at it still cannot advertise as “specialising in orthodontics” unless they hold specialist registration in that field.
The safe construction is “with a special interest in”, which is accurate and does not imply registration you do not hold. Unlawful use of a protected title is its own offence, carrying up to $60,000 per offence for an individual, up to three years imprisonment, or both.
“Painless” and “pain-free”
A promise about what a patient will feel is an outcome claim, and pain is subjective and variable. It also runs into the risk-disclosure requirement from the opposite direction: advertising should give accurate information about the risks or potential risks of a treatment, and “painless” asserts the absence of one.
What you almost certainly mean is that your practice is set up for anxious patients — longer appointments, topical anaesthetic before the needle, a stop signal, sedation options. Say that instead. It is more specific, it is verifiable, and it is far more reassuring to the person who is actually frightened.
Naming an anti-wrinkle product
Nothing to do with the National Law — this one is therapeutic-goods law. Prescription-only (Schedule 4) substances cannot be advertised to the public by brand name. Practices offering facial injectables must describe the treatment generically. It is also why you will see clinics write “anti-wrinkle injections” and coyly avoid the noun; that is not squeamishness, it is the law.
What to write instead
Every phrase above is a superlative, a promise or a piece of pressure. The replacement is nearly always the same move: swap the claim for a fact the patient can check.
| Instead of a claim | Use a checkable fact |
|---|---|
| “The best dentist in Brunswick” | “Treating families in Brunswick since 2009” |
| “Painless dentistry” | “Longer appointments, topical numbing before every injection, and a stop signal you control” |
| “Perfect smile guaranteed” | “We’ll show you a digital preview before we start, and talk through what is and isn’t achievable” |
| “Our patients love us” | “4.8 from 213 Google reviews” (linked to the profile) |
| “Limited-time whitening offer” | “Whitening is $X, all-inclusive, available year-round” |
| “Specialising in implants” | “Dr Chen has a special interest in implant dentistry and has placed over 400” |
The second column is harder to write and does more work. Superlatives are what you reach for when you have not decided what is actually true about your practice.
- Is this list official?
- No. Ahpra does not publish a banned-word list, and it is important not to imply otherwise — the National Law prohibits categories of claim, not specific words. This is our working list, built from the categories in the Guidelines for advertising a regulated health service and the examples in Ahpra’s summary of the requirements, and used as a build gate on the sites we ship.
- What if the phrase appears in a patient’s own words?
- That does not help you. If it is in your advertising, it is your advertising. A review that says “painless” republished on your website is both an outcome claim and, if it refers to treatment, a testimonial.
- Can I say “affordable”?
- “Affordable” on its own is a vague claim rather than a superlative, and is generally lower-risk than “cheapest” or “lowest prices”. But if you publish prices alongside it, they must be clear, accurate and include the total price, not just an entry-level figure.
- Does this list cover everything?
- No, and no list could. It catches the recurring, mechanical failures. It cannot catch a page that promises an outcome in fresh language, or a price that quietly excludes the crown. Read the guidelines in full and use Ahpra’s self-assessment tool as well.
Sources
- Summary of the advertising requirements — Ahpra
- Guidelines for advertising a regulated health service — Ahpra & the National Boards
- Titles in health advertising — Ahpra
- Advertising and the law — Ahpra
Keep reading
AHPRA compliance
AHPRA advertising rules for Australian dental practices: a plain-English guide
What section 133 of the National Law actually prohibits, what the maximum penalties really are, and how the rules apply to a dental practice website, Google reviews and social media. Sourced entirely to Ahpra.
ReadAHPRA compliance
Can you put Google reviews on your dental website in Australia?
Some reviews are testimonials and are prohibited in dental advertising. Some are not. Here is exactly where Ahpra draws the line, who is responsible for reviews on which platform, and why editing a review to make it safe is worse than leaving it off.
ReadAHPRA compliance
What an AHPRA advertising breach actually costs
The maximum penalty for an advertising breach rose from $5,000 to $60,000 for an individual, and from $10,000 to $120,000 for a body corporate. What changed, when, and what actually happens when someone complains.
Read